Skip to content

81

My Wellbeing…

14

My Classes…
statistically insignificant to analyze

13

My Career Goals…
statistically insignificant to analyze

--

General Health Intakes…

My Wellbeing

Total Exercises Taken

81

67

Self Identified

14

Anonymous

8.6%

AB Alerts Only

28.4%

Self Reported Alerts Only

28.4%

Both Alerts

45

Activation

51

Wellbeing

47

Positivity

Global Benchmark

Observations

Potential is highly activated across physical and emotional stress but less so for cognitive and behavioral stress.

This suggests that when people experience physical or emotional stress, they are more likely to feel disconnected from their future goals.

Inclusion is the biggest factor in emotional stress but is still present in cognitive and behavioral stress.

Emotional stress is strongly linked to feeling socially disconnected.

Immersion is a key factor in cognitive and behavioral stress but not in physical or emotional stress.

Cognitive stress may lead to hyper-focus or mental exhaustion, while behavioral stress may lead to avoidance or overcommitment.

Physical stress is strongly tied to autonomy and potential, meaning that people under physical stress often feel stuck in their current state.

Largest differences:
Potential (0.36), Inclusion (0.34), Autonomy (0.32)

Pattern:

  • Physical stress correlates strongly with unmet potential, autonomy, and inclusion needs.
  • People experiencing physical stress may feel like they have lost control over their future, feel isolated, or lack autonomy.
  • Success and recognition also show significant differences, meaning physical stress may be tied to performance pressures.

Emotional stress has the strongest ties to inclusion and safety needs, meaning that it is most deeply influenced by foundational disconnection and insecurity.

Largest differences:
Inclusion (0.40), Potential (0.39), Safety (0.39)

Pattern:

  • Emotional stress is most strongly linked to social and security-related needs.
  • People under emotional stress feel the greatest sense of social disconnection (inclusion) and insecurity (safety).
  • Justice, ethics, and purpose also show significant differences, meaning emotional stress may be tied to deeper moral concerns.

Cognitive stress is most associated with immersion, meaning it is often driven by mental over-engagement or exhaustion.

Largest differences:
Immersion (0.35), Autonomy (0.35), Caring (0.24)

Pattern:

  • Cognitive stress is most linked to over-engagement (immersion), loss of autonomy, and caring needs.
  • This suggests that cognitive stress may stem from feeling trapped in mentally demanding tasks or emotionally drained by social obligations.
  • Recognition and success differences are lower, meaning cognitive stress may be less about external validation and more about internal overload.

Behavioral stress is driven by immersion and inclusion, meaning that people dealing with it either withdraw from or over-commit to social and work-related activities.

Largest differences:
Immersion (0.27), Safety (0.17), Inclusion (0.16)

Pattern:

  • Behavioral stress is most tied to over-engagement (immersion), feeling unsafe, and social disconnection (inclusion).
  • This suggests that behavioral stress leads to unhealthy coping mechanisms such as avoidance, overworking, or isolating from social connections.
  • Autonomy activation is present but lower than in other stress types, meaning behavioral stress may be less about control and more about coping strategies.

Timeline

Semester Kickoff
8/26

Kick Off

Wellbeing Campaign
9/16

Wellbeing Campaign Sent

Wellbeing Campaign Start

 

Classes Campaign
10/21

Classes Campaign Start

General Inspo Campaign
10/28

General Inspo Campaign

Career Goals Campaign
11/4

Career Goals Campaign

End of Semester
12/18

Semester End

Calendar of Wellbeing Campaign Exercises Taken

Activation & Positivity – by Need

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Only Potential and Purpose skew to promotion needs.

Group Profile

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Highest Activation

Potential (0.60): This suggests that students feel a strong drive toward growth, learning, and self-improvement, but this may also indicate unmet needs related to realizing their full potential.

Purpose (0.50): A strong activation of purpose suggests that students are engaged in thinking about meaning and direction in life.

Autonomy (0.50) & Immersion (0.49): Both suggest that students are actively striving for independence and engagement, but these areas may also reflect some challenges.

Lowest Activation

Authenticity (0.29): This indicates that students may not be focusing much on expressing their true selves or feeling that they need to suppress aspects of their identity.

Justice (0.36) & Ethics (0.37): These lower activation levels suggest that students might not feel a strong need to address fairness, ethics, or social justice concerns at this time.

Highest Positivity

Purpose (0.61): This is the category with the highest dominance of promotion needs, meaning that it is activated by strong needs to find greater meaning in life.

Inclusion (0.50): This suggests that students have a relatively balanced sense of belonging.

Ethics (0.48) & Success (0.46): These areas show a moderate balance of promotion and prevention needs.

Lowest Positivity

Immersion (0.39) & Caring (0.40): These suggest that students are feeling a strong pull towards these needs, with some strong motives to avoid stagnation, boredom, and neglect.

Activation v Positivity Distribution

Group activation and positivity should not mask the broad distribution of students’ needs.

AgileBrain 10 States

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Likelihood of experiencing stress if either the AgileBrain Ten State of Stress Revealing or Relief Seeking is extremely high

75%
Physical
71%
Emotional
79%
Cognitive
52%
Behavioral

… and 36% of students who have taken the inspo exercise fall into Stress Revealing & Relief Seeking

Student Reported Symptoms of Stress

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Physical

Physical symptoms of stress like fatigue, headaches, digestive problems, weight changes, or sleep disturbances.

Frequently + Almost Always

61%

Emotional

Emotional symptoms of stress like anxiety or depression.

Frequently + Almost Always

60%

Cognitive

Cognitive symptoms of stress like difficulty concentrating or procrastinating.

Frequently + Almost Always

67%

Behavioral

Behavioral symptoms of stress like overusing substances, staying in bed, or avoiding social interactions.

Frequently + Almost Always

44%

Physical Stress + Activation

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Physical stress correlates strongly with unmet potential, autonomy, and inclusion needs.

People experiencing physical stress may feel like they have lost control over their future, feel isolated, or lack autonomy.

Success and recognition also show significant differences, meaning physical stress may be tied to performance pressures.

100% Increase in Activation

Students experiencing physical symptoms of stress show 100% increase in activation.

Positivity & Wellbeing
They also show a 24% drop in positivity, and 26% lower wellbeing

Interpretation & Observations

Higher Activation Across All Cells for Stressed Individuals:

Every framework cell shows higher activation in the stressed group compared to the unstressed group. This suggests that physical symptoms of stress are associated with a general increase in unmet needs across multiple domains.

Strongest Activation in the Stressed Group:

  • Potential (0.65 vs. 0.29): The most activated cell for the stressed group, suggesting a strong drive toward future possibilities but possibly an underlying fear of unfulfilled potential.
  • Autonomy & Purpose (both 0.53 vs. 0.21): Stressed individuals may feel a heightened need for independence and meaning, indicating stress-related concerns about control and direction in life.
  • Safety & Immersion (both 0.52 vs. 0.29): The elevated need for safety could reflect increased anxiety, while high immersion activation may suggest a coping mechanism (e.g., escaping into tasks or overstimulation).

Social & Material Domain Activation Differences:

  • Caring (0.50 vs. 0.36) & Inclusion (0.49 vs. 0.26): The stressed group has higher activation in social needs, implying a greater reliance on or lack of social support during stress.
  • Success (0.49 vs. 0.14) & Recognition (0.47 vs. 0.19): A substantial gap, with stressed individuals showing a much stronger drive toward achievement and validation—possibly stress-induced performance anxiety.

Ethical & Justice Needs More Activated in Stressed Group:

  • Ethics (0.40 vs. 0.12) & Justice (0.39 vs. 0.21): Stress may intensify concerns about fairness, integrity, and moral alignment, suggesting that individuals experiencing stress may feel more attuned to ethical conflicts.

Minimal Difference in Authenticity (0.30 vs. 0.29):

  • Unlike other cells, authenticity shows nearly identical activation levels in both groups, suggesting that stress does not significantly impact the perceived need for self-expression.

The data suggests that physical stress is linked to heightened activation across multiple needs, particularly those related to self-actualization (potential, autonomy, purpose), safety, success, and social connection.

The largest gaps appear in success (0.49 vs. 0.14) and ethics (0.40 vs. 0.12), indicating that stressed individuals might feel an intense pressure to succeed and be more attuned to ethical concerns.

The high activation in potential and autonomy suggests that stress may be tied to frustration with personal growth and control over one’s circumstances.

The relatively high caring and inclusion activation suggests that social needs remain strong under stress, but the difference from unstressed individuals implies that social support may be a key buffer against physical symptoms.

From our sample, the number of stressed students is alarmingly high

Activation by Need – Stressed vs Unstressed

Difference Between Stressed & Unstressed

Emotional Stress + Activation

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Emotional stress is most strongly linked to social and security-related needs.

People under emotional stress feel the greatest sense of social disconnection (inclusion) and insecurity (safety).

Justice, ethics, and purpose also show significant differences, meaning emotional stress may be tied to deeper moral concerns.

150% + Increase in Activation

Students experiencing emotional symptoms of stress show more than 150% increase in activation.

Positivity & Wellbeing
They also show a 18% drop in positivity, and 40% lower wellbeing.

Interpretation & Observations

Overall Activation is Higher in Stressed Individuals

As with physical symptoms, every framework cell shows higher activation in stressed individuals, suggesting that emotional stress heightens unmet needs across multiple areas.

Most Activated Needs for Stressed Individuals

  • Potential (0.65 vs. 0.25) → The most activated cell, suggesting unmet aspirations and a focus on what could be rather than what is.
  • Autonomy (0.55 vs. 0.25) → Indicates that emotional stress is linked to a need for greater control or independence.
  • Purpose (0.52 vs. 0.31) → A gap that suggests emotional stress is tied to questions about meaning and direction in life.
  • Safety (0.52 vs. 0.13) → A striking difference, pointing to heightened feelings of insecurity, anxiety, or emotional vulnerability.

Social & Recognition Needs Also Show Large Gaps

  • Caring (0.51 vs. 0.27) & Recognition (0.49 vs. 0.15) → Stressed individuals have a greater need for social connection and acknowledgment.
  • Inclusion (0.48 vs. 0.08) → A major gap, suggesting that social isolation or feelings of being left out contribute to emotional stress.

Achievement & Ethical Sensitivities Increase with Stress

  • Success (0.46 vs. 0.13) → A large difference, indicating that emotionally stressed individuals may feel pressured to achieve or worry about falling short.
  • Ethics (0.40 vs. 0.04) & Justice (0.38 vs. 0.08) → As in physical stress, emotional stress heightens concerns about fairness, morality, and doing the right thing.

Authenticity Shows a Smaller but Noticeable Gap

  • Authenticity (0.29 vs. 0.19) → Unlike other cells, authenticity shows a smaller difference. This suggests that while emotional stress heightens other needs, it does not dramatically impact the drive for self-expression.

Unmet Aspirations & Control Issues

The combination of high potential, autonomy, and purpose activation suggests that emotional stress may stem from feeling stuck, lacking direction, or fearing unfulfilled potential.

Anxiety & Emotional Vulnerability

The strong activation in safety (0.52 vs. 0.13) signals increased feelings of insecurity, a classic marker of emotional stress.

Social Disconnection & Desire for Recognition

The large gap in inclusion (0.48 vs. 0.08) suggests that loneliness or lack of belonging is a major emotional stressor. Recognition and success activation suggest a stress-driven need for validation.

Moral & Ethical Sensitivity

The elevated ethics and justice activation implies that emotional stress amplifies moral concerns, making individuals more attuned to fairness, integrity, and social justice.

From our sample, the number of stressed students is alarmingly high

Activation by Need – Stressed vs Unstressed

Difference Between Stressed & Unstressed

Cognitive Stress + Activation

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Cognitive stress is most linked to over-engagement (immersion), loss of autonomy, and caring needs.

This suggests that cognitive stress may stem from feeling trapped in mentally demanding tasks or emotionally drained by social obligations.

Recognition and success differences are lower, meaning cognitive stress may be less about external validation and more about internal overload.

50% Increase in Activation

Students experiencing cognitive symptoms of stress show a 50% increase in activation.

Positivity & Wellbeing
They also show a 11% drop in positivity, and 20% lower wellbeing.

Interpretation & Observations

Overall Activation is Higher for Stressed Individuals

Stressed individuals show elevated activation across all framework cells, consistent with the pattern seen in physical and emotional stress.

However, the differences in activation between stressed and unstressed individuals are somewhat smaller in cognitive stress compared to emotional and physical stress.

Most Activated Needs for Stressed Individuals

  • Potential (0.64 vs. 0.45) → The highest activation, indicating concern about the future, uncertainty, and unfulfilled potential.
  • Autonomy (0.56 vs. 0.21) → A large gap, suggesting cognitive stress may be heavily tied to perceived lack of control or feeling constrained.
  • Caring (0.52 vs. 0.29) & Purpose (0.52 vs. 0.38) → Indicates a need for meaning and social support in dealing with stress.
  • Immersion (0.49 vs. 0.43) → Unlike emotional stress, immersion is relatively high in both groups, suggesting that some unstressed individuals engage deeply in tasks, whereas stressed individuals may feel cognitively overwhelmed.

Safety Activation is Notably High (0.48 vs. 0.29)

  • This suggests that cognitive stress may be linked to a sense of vulnerability, insecurity, or the need for stability.
  • The difference (0.19) is one of the largest gaps, indicating that cognitive overload can trigger feelings of instability and stress.

Recognition, Success, and Inclusion Activation Differences

  • Recognition (0.44 vs. 0.29) & Success (0.46 vs. 0.33) → Suggests that pressure to perform, mental comparison to others, or fear of failure play a role in cognitive stress.
  • Inclusion (0.48 vs. 0.45) → Unlike emotional stress (where the gap was much larger), the difference here is minimal, suggesting that social isolation is not as strong a contributor to cognitive stress as it is to emotional stress.

Ethics & Justice Sensitivity is Present but Less Pronounced

  • Justice (0.40 vs. 0.29) & Ethics (0.39 vs. 0.19) → Still higher in stressed individuals, but these differences are smaller than in emotional stress.
  • This suggests that cognitive stress makes individuals somewhat more concerned about fairness and morality but not to the same degree as emotional stress.

Authenticity is Higher in Stressed Individuals (0.33 vs. 0.21)

  • Unlike emotional stress, where authenticity activation was similar across groups, cognitive stress has a larger difference.
  • This could indicate that people experiencing cognitive stress feel a greater need to express themselves or be true to their own thoughts.

Cognitive Overload & Loss of Control

The combination of high potential, autonomy, and safety activation suggests that cognitive stress may stem from mental overload, uncertainty, and feeling restricted.

The large autonomy gap (0.56 vs. 0.21) is especially telling—it suggests that people under cognitive stress may feel trapped in obligations or external demands.

Mental Exhaustion & Overcommitment

Immersion (0.49 vs. 0.43) remaining high in both groups suggests that some people under cognitive stress may be pushing themselves into deep work but struggling with focus.

This might indicate that stressed individuals are either overworking or mentally stuck, rather than disengaged.

Pressure to Perform & Recognition Needs

High activation of success and recognition suggests that fear of failure or external validation contributes to cognitive stress.

This aligns with symptoms like procrastination, mental fatigue, and decision paralysis.

Reduced but Present Ethical & Justice Sensitivity

While still present, ethical and justice concerns are less pronounced in cognitive stress than in emotional stress.

This suggests that cognitive stress is more about self-regulation, mental load, and performance concerns rather than fairness or morality.

From our sample, the number of stressed students is alarmingly high

Activation by Need – Stressed vs Unstressed

Difference Between Stressed & Unstressed

Behavioral Stress + Activation

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Behavioral stress is most tied to over-engagement (immersion), feeling unsafe, and social disconnection (inclusion).

This suggests that behavioral stress leads to unhealthy coping mechanisms such as avoidance, overworking, or isolating from social connections.

Autonomy activation is present but lower than in other stress types, meaning behavioral stress may be less about control and more about coping strategies.

33% Increase in Activation

Students experiencing behavioral symptoms of stress show a 33% increase in activation.

Positivity & Wellbeing
They also show a 16% drop in positivity, and 21% lower wellbeing.

Interpretation & Observations

Higher Overall Activation for Stressed Individuals

Like previous stress profiles, all framework cells show higher activation for stressed individuals than unstressed ones.

However, the gaps between stressed and unstressed groups are smaller than in emotional and cognitive stress, suggesting that behavioral symptoms may develop more gradually and be less extreme in perception.

Most Activated Needs for Stressed Individuals

  • Potential (0.63 vs. 0.54): The highest activation, though the gap is smaller (0.09) compared to other stress types, suggesting that behavioral symptoms may stem from chronic rather than acute concerns about future direction.
  • Autonomy (0.60 vs. 0.33): The largest gap in activation (0.27), suggesting that behavioral stress strongly correlates with feeling trapped, restricted, or unable to act freely.
  • Immersion & Caring (both 0.51 vs. 0.42): A high level of engagement and emotional connection, but with a significant gap, implying that stressed individuals may struggle with balance between over-engagement and withdrawal.

Social and Recognition Needs Play a Significant Role

  • Inclusion (0.48 vs. 0.32) & Recognition (0.47 vs. 0.35):
  • Social connections and external validation needs are highly activated in stressed individuals.
  • This suggests that behavioral symptoms may manifest as social withdrawal or overcompensation (e.g., seeking attention or validation).
  • Success (0.44 vs. 0.33):
  • The gap suggests that stressed individuals feel a need to prove themselves, potentially leading to burnout behaviors.

Ethical and Justice Sensitivities Remain Elevated

  • Ethics (0.44 vs. 0.31) & Justice (0.41 vs. 0.27):
  • Similar to other stress types, behavioral stress also heightens concerns about fairness, morality, and ethical integrity.
  • This could influence avoidance behaviors (e.g., disengaging from unjust environments) or overcommitment to causes.

Authenticity is Less Impacted Compared to Other Needs

  • Authenticity (0.31 vs. 0.24):
  • The difference is small, suggesting that behavioral stress does not significantly impact self-expression in the same way it affects autonomy or inclusion.

Feeling Trapped & Loss of Control (Autonomy, Potential, Purpose)

The large autonomy gap (0.60 vs. 0.33) suggests that feeling restricted in choices or actions is a major behavioral stressor.

This aligns with avoidance behaviors, procrastination, or self-sabotage as coping mechanisms.

Success and recognition activation suggest that overwork and overcommitment may also be stress responses.

Disengagement vs. Over-Engagement (Immersion, Caring)

High immersion activation suggests that some stressed individuals may cope through over-immersion (e.g., excessive work, escapism) while others disengage.

Caring activation suggests that stress-related behaviors might include overhelping or emotional withdrawal from others.

Social Withdrawal & External Validation (Inclusion, Recognition)

The activation of inclusion and recognition suggests a behavioral stress pattern linked to social needs.

Stressed individuals might withdraw from social interaction or seek excessive external validation to cope.

Ethical & Justice Concerns Impact Behavior

The elevated activation of ethics and justice suggests that moral concerns influence stress-related behaviors.

This could result in activism, moral distress, or disengagement from perceived unjust systems.

From our sample, the number of stressed students is alarmingly high

Activation by Need – Stressed vs Unstressed

Difference Between Stressed & Unstressed

Outlook: Today vs. 5 Years from Today

Group(s): Wellbeing Exercise
Total Respondents: 81

Students often see optimism about the future.

An exception of note is the individual who sees themselves as having the worst possible life now and in the same position five years from now. Not surprisingly this student fell into the AgileBrain Ten State of Relief Seeking.

Today

On which step of the ladder would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?

5 Years

On which step do you think you will stand about five years from now?

Back To Top